fbpx

Elecsys® GALAD score

In stock

Elecsys® GALAD score

FDA grants Breakthrough Device Designation for Roche’s Elecsys GALAD score to support earlier diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

➾ The Elecsys GALAD score aims to support clinicians in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma by giving them more timely and accurate information to make earlier interventions

➾ When hepatocellular carcinoma is detected and managed at the very earliest, patient’s 5-year survival rates can increase to over 70%1

➾ Utilizing blood-based biomarkers, as part of the Elecsys GALAD score, is minimally invasive to patients

Compare
Category:

Liver cancer is one of the few cancers that are on the rise.2 While recent developments in screening and new treatments are making advances in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of HCC, clinicians still face challenges in diagnosing the disease early enough. Only 44% of liver cancer patients are diagnosed at an early stage.3 Of HCC patients, which are diagnosed with late-stage disease, less than 16% survive a period of 5 years. Of the patients diagnosed at an early stage, 70% percent are still alive after five years1. Therefore, diagnosing HCC, as early as possible, is essential to improving patient outcomes.

ALAD score is a serum biomarker-based model that predicts the probability of having hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease. This combines gender and age with the results from assays AFP, AFP-L3 and PIVKA-II to give the clinician a clearer picture of HCC risk.

AFP-L3 is a subtype of AFP and can be used to differentiate an increase in AFP due to HCC, or benign liver disease. PIVKA-II is a precursor and abnormal form of prothrombin that is found in patients with HCC. This can be used to differentiate HCC from non-HCC hepatic diseases.PIVKA-II is an alternate name for des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP).

The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines recommend surveillance of high risk populations for HCC, every 6 months using ultrasound, either with or without a blood test to check protein levels (AFP).4 Ultrasound examinations can be sensitive enough to detect small masses on the liver. While easily done in a doctor’s office, ultrasound examinations are less conclusive with inexperienced technicians and in patients with obesity and fatty liver disease. A recent meta-analysis suggested that ultrasound may miss more than half of early stage HCCs.5 Therefore, other methods of diagnosis, such as abdominal CT scan, abdominal MRI scan or liver biopsy are often needed.4 These are more accurate than ultrasound, though are more invasive and uncomfortable for patients, as well as being costly to the healthcare system.

Ապրանքներ